Friday, February 22, 2013

What Does the Internet Bring to the Table that Television Doesn't?



Television has been one of the most successful mediums of information transfer. The continuous adaptation of content to suit viewers has allowed it to continue as the number one choice of media for decades. While radio and other mediums had a long standing presence prior to television, many factors only available to TV users allowed it to quickly overtake them in popularity. The ability to record programs and watch them at later times allowed a greater audience, compared to the set schedule of a radio broadcast. Similarly against its film adaptation counterpart, television was not limited to the timed viewings of movie theatres. Television also contained the ability to quickly adapt to what viewers wanted to see from the programs beyond the audio, as accompanying visuals were much more easily processed by the audience. The ability for an audience to see visuals of crime and other features was more engaging and at times shocking.

 In America, the most common form of receiving news is through television.
           The major functions of television include surveillance, correlation, entertainment and cultural transmission. Since the images of a news television show can be quickly and easily processed, surveillance through television has continued to be utilized both in the home and out. Many commercial areas, including shopping centers, restaurants and doctors will include a television in their building. Since television is so common everywhere one goes, it is easy to stay in touch with what is happening out in the world. Entertainment also plays a large role as a function of television. As channels continue to expand, more content focused on niche groups is created through entertaining television shows. No other medium has expressed the ability to tailor itself to the varying tastes of its audience.  Alternate sources are limited without the combination of visuals, audio and text that television offers.
 
  While the internet has provided alternate means of obtaining the same content you’d find on television, it has not overtaken TV’s presence.
             This is likely to change in the future due to the express nature of the internet. Where television had made a quick change to the pace of receiving content against other mediums, the internet continues to develop faster and faster tools. The support of internet on more and more devices is a large part of this speed. Services such as Twitter allow rapid-fire exchange of information, and with an internet-ready device, users can be instantly alerted to everything new. Internet users are also not tied down to the content provided by the broadcasters. While television has adapted quickly to viewers tastes, the internet once again does it faster. Users are able to easily and quickly create their own content regarding their interests and easily find others’ content as well. Video on Demand also allows users to bypass the schedules set by broadcasters. Instead of recording for a later date, they can simply purchase the content and watch it at any time. Certain services are beginning to cater exclusively to these crowds, such as Netflix with their new show House of Cards, available for streaming instantly without a week’s wait between episodes. This isn’t to say the internet does not encourage television to some degree. The widespread availability of TV show clips has allowed more users to become aware of shows or programs which they then might watch on television. This support is most likely why television continues to outweigh internet as a medium.

http://internet-tv-sites-review.toptenreviews.com/

1 comment:

  1. I found this post to be somewhat misleading as I anticipated learning more about the Internet’s impact on television, given the title, versus the power of television as a medium. The factual information about the power of television is insightful, just as the end of the post’s explanation of the internet’s accessibility to promote television viewing, however I’m not clear on the overall impact.

    As I began reading the blog, it only described television and some of this medium’s strengths. Not until the very end of the blog was there information on the Internet and the post concluded by saying, “The widespread availability of TV show clips has allowed more users to become aware of shows or programs which they then might watch on television. This support is most likely one of the reasons why television continues to outweigh Internet as a medium.” In my opinion, I think the title should have been “ Television is Still King, While Enhanced by the Internet”.

    I believe Television is the most powerful medium because based on the blog post, there are multiple explanations as to the tremendous content television brings to the viewers, and there is a lot more information on television than the Internet in this piece. That being said, with a switch in the title, it would be a more impactful post.

    Leah did a great job starting her post with background information on television and the reasons as to why it is the most successful medium for information. Her comparison from TV to radio allowed the reader to understand why TV is in fact the most popular source for gaining information. In addition, the image incorporated into the post demonstrated how clear it is that television is used far more often than the internet further supporting that television is viewed more and offers the best news. Further into the blog post, Leah discussed the major functions of television, which was an effective way to inform the reader of the different usages of television and what they stand for.

    Finally, in the concluding paragraph of the blog, there is a good explanation of an Internet differentiation to television. Leah discusses the speed of the Internet, being much faster than Television, and how it continues to develop. The only impact addressed is the ability to view clips, which could in turn send viewers to the televised program. It is interesting that the internet offers on demand viewing and people prefer it on the internet, while television also offers on demand viewing today as well. Perhaps I may have discussed the impact that multi-screens have on television viewing. For example, today we obtain our information from so many sources that our derived from the Internet. While watching television viewers now have options to participate in social media on their computers, smart phones, and iPads, etc. while multi-tasking, watching their favorite shows. This distraction is likely to have an impact on overall television viewing and success. Contrary, these other digital screens also have a strong impact on television by reinforcing the messages, programs, and content that is available on all screens. With the evolution of the Internet, it is likely that the gap between Internet usage and TV viewing as outlined in Leah’s graph will be narrowed over time. I enjoyed reading Leah’s blog as she made some interesting points, and captured my attention. I do think however, that this post could have been more evenly balanced in regard to the Internet having an impact on television.

    ReplyDelete